Last year, Major League Wrestling filed an antitrust lawsuit against World Wrestling Entertainment claiming that WWE monopolized the industry. The lawsuit alleged that WWE informed the third parties to avoid doing business with MLW.
On February 14th, Judge Edward J. Davila of the U.S. District Court, California Northern District (San Jose) dismissed the lawsuit due to insufficient facts. However, the judge gave MLW 21 days to amend the lawsuit.
On Tuesday, MLW filed the amended lawsuit against WWE in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Jose Division. In the lawsuit, MLW alleged that their exclusion of the Peacock streaming platform.
“Most recently, WWE’s predatory conduct further impeded MLW in its ability to compete in the licensing of its programming for distribution on streaming services and continues to threaten to deprive MLW of its ability to license its programming for distribution on cable. As a result of WWE’s misconduct, MLW is at risk of its business being irreparably destroyed. In February 2023, MLW’s new media partner — Reelz — announced a distribution deal with streaming service Peacock. But as a direct result of WWE’s exclusivity arrangement with NBCUniversal, which prohibits any other professional wrestling programming on Peacock, MLW’s programming is excluded from this streaming deal, which further suppresses competition in the Relevant Market. MLW also is reportedly at risk of losing its cable deal with Reelz as a result of WWE’s exclusivity with Peacock.”
MLW also alleged that WWE attempted to prevent the Ring of Honor G1 Supercard from taking place at Madison Square Garden in 2018.
“WWE has engaged in a continued pattern of blocking its competitors from accessing favorable venues. For example, in the summer of 2018, ROH, a competing professional wrestling promotion owned at the time by Sinclair, booked a major wrestling show in New York’s iconic Madison Square Garden (“MSG”). The show at MSG was to be a joint feature between NJPW and Sinclair’s ROH. MSG has long been considered WWE’s “home turf” and Sinclair intentionally planned the show in MSG as “part of a move to expand the promotion’s events into larger venues.
ROH’s MSG show sold out immediately, with wrestling fans excited about a show in this popular and iconic venue. WWE, however, had other plans. WWE had scheduled WrestleMania for the same weekend at the nearby MetLife Stadium, and did not want any ROH MSG show to compete with it.
In a naked attempt to restrain competition through the abuse of its market power, WWE, through Paul Levesque, its then-Executive Vice President, called MSG to insist that MSG cancel the show with ROH and NJPW. Unable to resist the pressure from the industry behemoth, MSG succumbed, and withdrew from the ROH agreement and cancelled the ROH show. While Sinclair threatened to sue MSG over their agreement, and the show was rescheduled, ROH and NJPW were forced to incur significant legal expense to vindicate their legal rights and to defend against WWE’s anti-competitive behavior. A smaller nascent competitor, without the support of Sinclair, may not have been able to resist such pressure and incur the necessary legal expenses to vindicate its rights.”
In the amended lawsuit, MLW alleged that WWE controlled 92% of the pro wrestling industry, AEW 6%, and the other independent promotions battling for 2%.
Stay tuned with The Spotlight for more news.